You may remember Dell ’s fancy - pantsCrystal Monitor , the sliver of cuteness that cost rich guys $ 1,200 . We know it looks nice , but how does it , you know , work ? Not so well , it turn out .
https://gizmodo.com/ultra-pretty-dell-crystal-lcd-monitor-now-available-339805
Much like a amber - incrust hot dog , this thing is pretty on the outside but does n’t have the goods on the inside to make it worth the Mary Leontyne Price . maximal personal computer refresh it , finding that the composition of shabu that covers the monitor pretty much ruin the experience .
The varan ’s artful outside look great on our background . If only the picture followed suit . Even after cranking the Crystal ’s brightness to the extremes , the 1680×1050 - native picture was ineffective to produce satisfactory difference on its dark grayscales during our DisplayMate testing . This translate to a noticeable expiration of quality and increase darkness spirit level in every existent - world test we could conspire up : details get off our picture and motion picture ; subtle lighting outcome smudged together on our games .
This is the fuel behind the Crystal ’s impassioned glare return . The show ’s tempered glassful bring the entire social unit a mirror - like quality , more so than any glossy - panel monitor lizard we ’ve reviewed . We did n’t comment ourselves when we were work with a brighter scene , but seeing our clamant reflection during colored images , like Sweeney Todd , was more than a simple misdirection . It destroyed the picture .
They ended up giving the Crystal LCD a 5 out of 10 rating , and as anybody who ’s gone to shoal knows , getting 50 % on a test is a pretty epic fail . [ maximal PCviaBoing Boing gismo ]
CrystalDellMonitors
Daily Newsletter
Get the in effect tech , science , and culture newsworthiness in your inbox daily .
News from the future , drive home to your present .
You May Also Like
